Many state statutes require a written list or statement when a landlord retains deposit funds. The deadline, specificity, supporting documents, delivery method, property coverage, and exceptions vary.
Use this guide to compare the timing, detail, supporting documents, delivery method, and arithmetic of an itemized statement with the applicable rule.
What to look for in an itemized statement
A useful itemization lets you understand and verify each charge. The statute may require less or more, but look for:
- Each deduction listed separately: A lump sum such as "Repairs: $800" can be difficult to evaluate; compare its detail with the applicable rule.
- Description of the work: What was repaired/cleaned, where in the unit, and why.
- Dates: When the work was done or when damage was discovered.
- Amounts: The cost for each item, with breakdowns where appropriate.
- Receipts or invoices: Required in some states; helpful in all.
- Age and replacement information: For replaced items, age, prior condition, repairability, and any betterment from new replacement.
Example: A detailed itemization
Here's what a legitimate itemization might look like:
Security Deposit Itemization — 123 Main St, Unit 4 Deposit paid: $1,500 1. Carpet stain removal, living room — $150 (receipt attached) 2. Drywall repair, bedroom — hole near closet — $85 (photo + invoice attached) 3. Missing garage remote — $45 replacement cost Total deductions: $280 Amount due tenant: $1,220 Check enclosed, dated within 21-day deadline.
This example is specific and documented, which makes it easier to evaluate. It does not establish that any listed charge is legally recoverable.
Example: A problematic itemization
Compare with this common but problematic format:
Security Deposit Statement Cleaning: $400 Repairs: $650 Carpet: $800 Total deducted: $1,850 No refund due.
Questions to raise: no descriptions or locations, no cost support, no age or prior-condition evidence, and no explanation of why the total exceeds the stated deposit. Each issue still depends on the governing rule and facts.
Details that need closer review
These patterns deserve a closer review:
Vague descriptions
- "Cleaning fee" with no explanation of what was cleaned
- "Repairs" without specifying what was repaired
- "Labor" without describing the work
- "Miscellaneous" or "other charges"
Amounts that need cost support
- Full replacement cost without age, prior condition, repairability, or betterment analysis
- Professional cleaning fees when you left the unit clean
- Large charges with no receipts or invoices
- Amounts that seem excessive for the work described
Maintenance or turnover work
- Full repainting without evidence of tenant-caused damage, affected area, prior paint condition, and actual cost
- Carpet cleaning without a move-in and move-out condition comparison or record of the work
- HVAC filter replacement without checking the lease, local duties, cause, and actual cost
- Touch-ups or minor repairs without evidence connecting the work to a tenant-caused condition
Missing or late delivery
- No itemization received at all
- Itemization received after the deadline
- Itemization sent to wrong address
State requirements for itemizations
What's required varies by state:
California
- Must provide itemization within 21 days
- Bills, invoices, receipts, or equivalent records generally accompany combined repair and cleaning deductions over $125; a timely tenant request can require the records even at $125 or less
- Covered move-outs from April 2025: statutory move-out and repair-photo procedure
- Bad-faith failure to comply can bar claims against the deposit; do not assume every late statement has that result
Washington
- Must provide "full and specific statement"
- Washington damage charges require the supporting estimates, paid invoices, material-cost records, and landlord-labor details specified by the official rule
- Self-performed work must show time and hourly rate
- A signed move-in checklist is required before collecting a deposit; undocumented condition can limit damage deductions
Colorado
- Must provide written statement with "exact reasons"
- On written request, the landlord has 14 days to provide relevant records in the landlord's possession or control
- Wrongful withholding forfeits the right to retain the disputed amount; the treble remedy also requires the 7-day demand-and-intent notice and nonreturn during that period
New York
- Must provide itemization within 14 days
- Failure to itemize = forfeit right to retain any portion
Florida
- Landlord claim notice within 30 days may use certified mail or qualifying email
- Tenant has 15 days to object after receiving
- A defective or late notice can forfeit the claim against the deposit while preserving a separate damages action
How to respond to a bad itemization
If the itemization is late, vague, unsupported, or inconsistent, review it in this order:
Step 1: Request documentation
Ask for receipts, photos, and explanations for each charge. Keep your request factual and specific. Template: Request receipts/invoices.
Step 2: Evaluate each charge
Use the Deduction Checker to organize questions for each line item. Look for ordinary wear, age and prior condition, missing documentation, repairability, betterment, and unsupported amounts.
Step 3: Write a dispute letter
Challenge each improper deduction with specific arguments. Template: Dispute deductions letter.
Step 4: Escalate if needed
If no response arrives or the disputed charges remain unresolved, consider a factual demand letter that cites the source and describes remedies conditionally. Then verify court options. Generate a demand letter.
What if you never received an itemization?
A missing itemization can be a significant procedural issue, but it does not have one national consequence. New York, Florida, California, and other states use different forfeiture, liability, mental-state, and exception language.
Steps: verify the trigger and deadline, preserve nonreceipt evidence, request the accounting and amount due in writing, cite the official rule accurately, and review the court procedure if the dispute remains unresolved.